Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Freitorell Capital's avatar

Thanks for the thesis.

I am curious though. In a world where KNSL exists, why would one own SKWD?

KNSL's combined ratio is far superior (77% vs 90%), and if the thesis is around E&S market growth, they are 100% concentrated on E&S vs 55% for SKWD.

Also, in my view, the biggest point one should look for in insurance before anything else is risk management. In this post I only see "deep expertise, disciplined underwriting" which doesn't mean much.

I would like to know if they outsource their underwriting for example, as that is a big sign of whether the company is in control of it and considers it a core competency or not. Nevertheless, I appreciate the breakdown of their underwriting by line of business and geography.

The point I would see in SKWD's favour is valuation as KNSL's is considerably higher. The quality of the business is better though, so it should command a higher multiple.

Disclaimer: KNSL is a big part of my portfolio, but I am always looking for added perspectives.

Disclaimer 2: I don't know anything about SKWD besides what you wrote in your piece, hence the questions.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts