Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike's avatar

Strong growth, consumer love (NPS), and network effects of lockers. But I think the thesis may need more work on acquisitions, competitive threats, and valuation multiples. The risk is that InPost turns into a capital-intensive, mid-margin logistics operator rather than a high-margin tech-like platform — which would justify lower multiples.

Geographic Concentration - Despite international expansion, nearly half of revenue still comes from Poland. If Allegro and other players squeeze them there, the international diversification may not offset near-term headwinds.

Technology & Future Disruption - AI-enabled route optimization, EV delivery fleets, or peer-to-peer networks may hit margins faster than drones.

Macroeconomic Exposure - Recession called out, but Poland and the UK are more volatile markets, and discretionary e-commerce spending is sensitive to downturns. Growth is tied to consumer parcel volumes. A few years of stagnation or contraction could derail the compounding assumptions.

Capital Structure & Shareholder Returns - what is their debt levels? . InPost has funded expansion partly with leverage. Rising rates in Europe raise refinancing risks.

Competitive Dynamics - Allegro is called out, but Amazon, DHL, DPD, GLS, and local couriers are not. All are aggressively investing in parcel lockers and last-mile services. Saying “they nailed the consumer experience” may be true in Poland, but brand loyalty and NPS in Western Europe may not translate, especially when Amazon can leverage Prime to shift habits.

Big Pepe's avatar

Nice write-up! I'd also want to look at Management to Shareholder alignment

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?